Don't Let Your AI Hallucinate: Pairing LLMs with Reality Check Systems

Don't Let Your AI Hallucinate: Pairing LLMs with Reality Check Systems


3 min read

The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized the understanding and generation of user intent into actionable specifications. However, the challenge of hallucination within these models necessitates a shift towards a more deterministic approach for critical decision-making scenarios. This essay proposes a solution leveraging LLMs for their strengths while mitigating their weaknesses through the use of deterministic backend systems, like IntegrationOS, for execution.

  1. Introduction to LLM Hallucination

    • Hallucination in LLMs refers to the production of ungrounded or incorrect content, posing significant challenges in applications requiring high accuracy and trustworthiness. This phenomenon underscores the necessity for a more deterministic approach in critical decision-making applications.
  2. Capabilities of LLMs: Understanding User Intent and Generating Specs

    • LLMs excel at interpreting nuanced user communications, transforming them into detailed specs for action. This ability forms the cornerstone of their utility in automating complex tasks.
  3. Proposed Solution: Leveraging Backend Systems for Determinism

    • The inherent limitations of LLMs in making direct, critical decisions due to the risk of hallucination necessitate a hybrid approach. By employing backend systems like IntegrationOS to interpret and execute LLM-generated specs, we can ensure a more deterministic and reliable outcome. IntegrationOS serves as the intermediary, determining the necessity of user confirmation based on the specs' context and complexity.
  4. Practical Example: Booking a Business Trip with IntegrationOS

    • Scenario Introduction: Consider a user requesting to book a business trip through a platform powered by an LLM. The user specifies their preferences for the trip directly to the LLM.

    • LLM Processing: The LLM interprets the user's request, generating a detailed spec for the trip, including flight and accommodation preferences.

    • IntegrationOS Interpretation: As a backend system, IntegrationOS interprets these specs to identify the necessary API calls for booking flights and accommodations. It assesses whether the action requires user confirmation, such as when the cost exceeds a predetermined threshold or when multiple options match the user's criteria closely. These specs would have been predefined before, and the user would have added their preferences.

      • User Confirmation Process: If confirmation is required, the app generates an interactive card, presenting the user with the planned itinerary, options, and costs. This card includes buttons for the user to confirm the booking, request changes, or cancel the procedure.
    • Execution Upon Confirmation: Following user confirmation, IntegrationOS executes the necessary API calls to finalize the bookings, ensuring each step aligns with the generated specifications. It then notifies the user of the successful bookings, providing all relevant details and options for further modifications if necessary.


By integrating LLMs with deterministic backend systems like IntegrationOS, it's possible to harness the full potential of AI in automating and executing tasks with high accuracy and reliability. This hybrid approach, exemplified by the business trip booking scenario, illustrates a practical solution to the challenge of LLM hallucinations, ensuring that AI applications can be trusted in critical decision-making contexts. Through careful system design and the strategic use of user confirmations, we can create AI-driven systems that not only understand and generate user intent into actionable specs but also execute these actions with precision and user-aligned confirmation.